A Review Of trade secret case law
A Review Of trade secret case law
Blog Article
Should the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced an opportunity to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is generally only completed if the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and the petitioner company responded towards the allegations therefore they were properly mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair on the offender as well as the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
The ruling of your first court created case law that must be accompanied by other courts until or Until both new regulation is created, or possibly a higher court rules differently.
184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the moment case, the guidelines as set forth would not use, as being the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, alternatively he is acquitted with the criminal charges based on evidence and it truly is nicely-settled legislation that once the civil servant is acquitted in the criminal case, then on this really charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment by the department and held him disqualified to the post because acquittal for all long run purposes. The aforesaid proposition has been set at naught with the Supreme Court of Pakistan during the case of the District Police Officer Mainwali and 2 others v.
Generally speaking, higher courts don't have direct oversight over the reduce courts of record, in that they cannot attain out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments from the decreased courts.
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in support in the Supreme Court, ensuring the enforcement of its judgments. Given that the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become reached, the decision on the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) from the Constitution. Read more
In the event you find an error from the information of a published opinion (for instance a misspelled name or possibly a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is well-settled that though thinking of the case of normal promotion of here civil servants, the competent authority must look at the merit of the many qualified candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to these kinds of eligible candidates who are found being most meritorious among them. Since the petitioner was held to be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded through the respondent department just to increase favor for the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy within the part from the respondent department.
The law of necessity regarded and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it was the illegal action called regulation of necessity..
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair for the offender as well as the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts Nevertheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The lots of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to get gathered with the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent and also the case under appeal, Most likely overruling the previous case law by setting a completely new precedent of higher authority. This may possibly occur several times given that the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first in the High Court of Justice, later of your Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his improvement of your concept of estoppel starting inside the High Trees case.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, it is also a nicely-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is issue into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.